Desirable Groundwater and Surface Water Regime in the Netherlands (GGOR): situation in 2001
Provincial authorities must determine the Desirable Groundwater and Surface Water Regime (GGOR) no later than 2002. The desirable regime must be appropriate for the intended use of the space in question. Determining the GGOR for all desired types of nature functions will allow the GGOR to play an important role in the concrete elaboration of the desiccation objectives.
| Year determination GGOR | Natural area plans used | Nature function maps used | |
| Groningen | 2002 | yes | yes |
| Friesland | approximately 2010 | no | yes |
| Drenthe | 2004 | no | yes |
| Overijssel | 2005-2010 | yes | yes |
| Gelderland | not known | not known | not known |
| Flevoland | 1) | yes | yes |
| Utrecht | 2004 | yes | yes |
| North Holland | 1) | no | yes |
| South Holland | not known | not known | yes |
| Zeeland | not known | yes | yes |
| North Brabant | 2003 | no | yes |
| Limburg | 2002 | yes | yes |
| Source: IPO | RIVM/EDC/Oct02/0414 | ||
| 1) In Flevoland and North Holland, the GGOR is adopted by provincial authorities for the entire area. | |||
Progress determination GGOR
The provincial authorities will not manage to determine the GGOR for all of the Netherlands by 2002. It may take until 2010 before the GGOR is available for the whole country.
It is also questionable to what extent the GGOR will be comparable for the various provinces. For the purposes of policy evaluation, it would appear to be desirable for the results at least of these provincial processes to be comparable.
Note on GGOR
The GGOR concept also includes the Optimal and the Current Groundwater and Surface Water Regimes (OGOR and AGOR respectively). The OGOR is the situation in which the hydrological situation of the soil is entirely appropriate for the intended use of that soil (the use function). That applies to both the quality and the quantity of the water. This OGOR can be calculated or determined for each soil-use function.
If functions with a different/totally different OGOR, for example agriculture and wet nature, are in contact or intertwined with each other, a compromise must be found or a decision made. For example, an optimal situation for one of the functions and a marginal situation for the other. This complex of socially-determined priorities is known as the GGOR.
The importance of GGOR for the approach to desiccation
The GGOR and OGOR concept provides interesting possibilities for elaborating the desiccation objective into measurable nature and water objectives. OGORs can be calculated for all groundwater-dependent types of nature function. From the point of view of the nature objective, the difference between the AGOR and the OGOR is the level of desiccation.
Achievement of the GGOR means that desiccation has been dealt with, at least in policy terms. AGOR and GGOR can be measured relatively straightforwardly in the field. As part of the 2003 survey of desiccated areas, the relevant working group will be developing a proposal for transforming the current desiccation objective into an objective in terms of OGOR and/or GGOR.
Problems with the elaboration of the GGOR
There is a fair level of confusion about the GGOR and all the associated areas, both in technical and administrative terms. Arcadis has made an attempt to make things clear, particularly on the administrative/legal side. It received instructions to this effect from the Directorate General for Public Works and Water Management (Rijkswaterstaat), the Association of Provincial Authorities (IPO), the Association of Water Boards and STOWA (Arcadis, 2000). In broad terms, there is agreement with the conclusions of that study that the water control boards should elaborate the GGOR in close consultation with the groundwater authority (generally the provincial authority) and the municipal authority. The GGOR is then included in the water management plan of the water control board, which is approved by the provincial authority.
The Commission on Integrated Water Management has now adopted the broad recommendations of this report. A number of ambiguities still require resolution. For example, there is the relationship between the GGOR and the recently-developed water assessment, spatial planning and regional standards. Furthermore, provincial authorities implement the process in their own ways in order to arrive at a GGOR. All this means that the GGOR will, in most cases, not be completed in 2002.
Policy
The Fourth Policy Document on Water Management (V&W, 1998) requested the provincial authorities to determine the desired water table no later than 2002. Later, the desired water table was changed to the GGOR.



